← All verdicts

Which AI can you trust for debris & conjunction context?

By , Founder and Self-Directed Space Researcher, Viventine Space Systems · updated

Breakup events, debris and rocket-body populations, collision-risk thresholds and standards.

On their own, no AI earns "Trust it" here. With Orbit Sentinel tools: Claude Fable 5.1, Claude Opus 5.5, Claude Sonnet 5.5, Claude Haiku 5.5, Grok 4.7.

AI Closed-book With Orbit Sentinel tools n
right / wrong range declined right / wrong range declined
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic
45 / 10
31–60 45
94 / 2
83–98 4 42×2
Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic
40 / 7
27–56 52
93 / 2
81–98 5 42×3
Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic
45 / 17
31–60 38
93 / 4
81–98 3 42×3
Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic
14 / 14
7–28 71
87 / 1
74–94 12 42×3
Grok 4.7 xAI
12 / 5
5–25 83
85 / 4
71–92 12 42×2
Gemma 4 12B Google
10 / 34
4–23 56
52 / 18
37–66 30 42×3
gpt-oss 20B OpenAI
12 / 64
5–25 24
44 / 19
31–59 37 42×3
DeepSeek-R1 14B DeepSeek
12 / 50
5–25 38
—
42×1

% right / % wrong per cell; color is the verdict (green trust it, amber verify, red don't use). Range is the 95% interval for % right, counting each question once; n is questions × runs for the tools track.

Sample questions

All published questions with their answers →